Whistle Blowers

Why, if it was a hoax, was NASA so careless with so much of their evidence?

No matter if think the Apollo missions were faked or not.  One thing you have to accept is that NASA is not stupid.  It's packed full of the best brains in the U.S. and you'd like to think they know are thing or two about science.   But so much of what is presented as evidence as a hoax would suggest that they were really careless in how they went about faking things.   If the shadows are at the wrong angles then why did no-one realize that lighting the lunar landscape with banks of spotlights was not a good idea?    If the radiation meant it wasn't possible to go without lead lined walls, then why didn't they just pretend that they did line the Apollo crafts with lead?   It really is difficult to believe that NASA could be so stupid.  So why were these mistakes made?

To get around this the hoax proponents introduce the "whistle blower".   These are un-named and unknown people within NASA who were supposed to be upset with the fakery.  So they deliberately got things wrong and left little clues so that really smart people like the hoax proponents could spot them.   They didn't, and haven't in all this time, actually come forward and admitted they're involvement because NASA kills people who reveal its secrets!

We can't produce evidence that disproves this theory of 'whistle blowers' except to point out;

• As explained in the rest of this site, the deliberate errors they are supposed to have introduced aren't errors at all.
• The US Government is rubbish at keeping secrets like this.  And this is one that would have to have involved hundreds if not thousands of people.   Could so many people be trusted to keep quiet?
• The only smart people to have spotted these errors are remarkably light on scientific qualifications, but all are very experienced when it comes to promoting books and videos they have for sale.  No-one with any real expertise in the fields of science involved have spotted or been convinced by them.